The Purity Gap: Why 4 PPT matters when the limit is 1000 PPM
News

The Purity Gap: Why 4 PPT matters when the limit is 1000 PPM

The global conversation about drinking water quality highlights a critical discrepancy: while some contaminants are measured at the parts per trillion (PPT) level, others are allowed at parts per million (PPM), revealing a significant "purity gap" in international standards.

The two tiers of water standards

Regulatory limits across the globe are highly variable. This is evident in the standards for two key measurements:

  1. Aesthetic Standards (PPM): Measures like Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), which primarily affect taste, scaling, and the aesthetic quality of water. Many countries, such as Australia and South Africa, accept TDS limits up to or more.

  2. Health-Based Standards (PPT): Measures for highly toxic, trace contaminants like PFAS ('forever chemicals'). These chemicals are so potent that safe limits must be set orders of magnitude lower. For example, the proposed U.S. limit for certain PFAS is , dramatically lower than most other global limits (e.g., the EU's for the sum of 20 PFAS).

Region Contaminant/Measure Standard/Limit Type of Concern
United States (Proposed) Individual PFAS (PFOA/PFOS) 4 PPT Health (Ultra-trace Toxin)
Australia (ADWG) Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Up to 1000 PPM Aesthetic (Taste/Scaling)

PPM vs. PPT: Understanding the Scale

Understanding the difference between PPM and PPT is essential for grasping the risk of trace contaminants. Both are concentration units, but they represent wildly different scales of purity.

Unit Abbreviation Represents Analogy Conversion
Parts Per Million PPM () 1 part in One minute in two years
Parts Per Trillion PPT() 1 part in One second in 32,000 years


A concentration measured in PPM is one million times greater than the same number measured in PPT. When you see limits in the single-digit PPT range (like for PFAS), it emphasizes the extreme toxicity and the rigorous detection methods needed to protect public health from these tiny, but dangerous, trace chemicals.

To ensure true purity, consumers must look beyond regional aesthetic guidelines and demand water purification standards that meet or exceed the strictest PPT health-based limits.

Previous
What is an Atmospheric Water Generator (AWG) and why is it important?
Next
The silent threat: 'Forever Chemicals' in our drinkingwater